Select your language

Roaring bear

Tech and AI Stocks – Technical Correction or Start of a Revaluation?

A brief analysis of the current market situation – Status: End of October 2026 ·

Stocks in the tech and AI sector are currently under increased pressure. And as it appears, it is more than a mere “dip.” We may be seeing a noticeable revaluation and correction in the tech and AI sector, driven by concerns about the sustainability of massive investments and valuations. At the same time, this is not yet a complete, permanently lower revaluation of the entire sector as in a classic bubble burst.

Current Market Development

At the end of October 2026, the Nasdaq 100 is significantly below its early October high – roughly 5 to 8 percent below the peak around October 6. The Magnificent 7 stocks are collectively several trillion below their highs: Alphabet and Meta in some cases more than 20 percent below, Nvidia around 10 percent, while Apple remained comparatively stable. The semiconductor sector was at times under even stronger pressure.

The year 2026 is still overall positive for the Nasdaq (year-to-date in the low to mid double-digit range), but the momentum has clearly slowed. The correction is real and selective – not all titles are equally affected.

Valuations in Comparison

The big names – particularly Nvidia, Microsoft, and Alphabet – are trading at significantly more moderate forward P/E multiples than in the hype phases. They often lie in the range of about 17- to 25-fold, depending on the estimate and horizon. At Nvidia, the multiples are in some cases close to multi-year lows and clearly below their own historical averages.

The cause is the strong earnings development: The multiples have compressed even though prices had previously risen. Comparisons with the dot-com peak (Cisco often over 100-fold) clearly favor the current situation. The leading companies are highly profitable and cash-generative – not loss-making startups.

At the same time, longer-term measures such as the CAPE (Shiller P/E) of the overall market remain elevated and concentration is extreme. In niches – some software and pure-play AI titles as well as neoclouds – valuations remain high or have already been strongly corrected. Pockets of froth exist especially among highly leveraged infrastructure players and in the private sector.

Drivers of the Current Correction

The revaluation is driven primarily by the reality of the capex wave. The major hyperscalers are investing hundreds of billions (guidance sums in the range of 700–800 billion USD and more for 2026), increasingly also with debt. Analyses such as those from Goldman Sachs point to large gaps between capex and already realized AI revenues: For a break-even on the 2026 spending, significantly higher AI revenues would be needed than are currently visible.

Free cash flow is coming under pressure at some companies, circular financing (investments among each other) is viewed critically, and there are signals of capacity and supply bottlenecks or somewhat slower sequential growth. This hits hardware, semiconductors, and financing-dependent infrastructure players particularly hard.

Assessment: Bullish vs. More Cautious View

Bullish view (many asset managers and analysts): No 2000 scenario. Strong fundamentals, genuine technology adoption, and earnings growth support the market. Multiples are no longer extreme; setbacks are more of a “digestion” or sentiment reset. Quality titles with robust cash flows can weather this; in the long term AI remains a megatrend. Some see parallels more to 1997 than to 2000.

More cautious view: Expectations for ROI and monetization are high and partly anticipatory. If capex growth flattens or returns disappoint, this can further burden earnings at suppliers and valuations. Debt financing and high concentration increase the risk of larger corrections. Some observers expect 30 percent and more setbacks in the AI heavyweights over twelve months or already see signs of a “slow boil.”

Currently it looks more like a selective revaluation and risk sorting than a complete collapse. The profitable platform leaders with diversified businesses (ads, cloud core, software) are better positioned than pure capex-dependent or highly valued speculation titles. China has already experienced a sharper correction in the AI and chip area.

What Will Be Decisive

The upcoming earnings – especially capex guidance and AI revenue traction –, the credit markets for the infrastructure names, and the question of whether the expected revenues and margins materialize before write-downs and interest costs fully hit. In the short term, further dips or volatility may come. A permanently lower revaluation of the entire sector would primarily occur if the monetary gap does not close and the investment momentum breaks noticeably.

Conclusion

The technology itself is real, but the valuation and timing risks have clearly risen. It is more than a mere dip, yet not yet a broad, structurally lower revaluation of the entire tech and AI sector. The situation is data-driven mixed and dependent on expectations.

Note: This post serves exclusively for information and does not constitute investment advice, a buy or sell recommendation. The assessments presented are based on publicly available data and analyses as of the end of October 2026 and can change quickly. Every investment decision should be based on one’s own research and, if necessary, professional advice.

Related Articles

Risk Warning: Trading CFDs and other leveraged financial products on margin and derivatives always involves a high degree of risk. There is a possibility of losing all or part of your invested capital. Therefore, these products may not be suitable for all investors. Please ensure that you obtain detailed information on these products and/or consult an independent financial advisor.

The website operator may be remunerated by advertisers on this website based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.

Disclaimer: The authors' assessments of market behaviour contained on this website do not constitute financial advice or a solicitation or recommendation to buy or sell financial products, but are merely a personal assessment. If you incorporate the author's assessment into your decision, you do so entirely at your own risk. If you trade in financial products, you must be aware that you may incur a loss of up to the amount of your entire investment. Actively familiarise yourself with trading and the characteristics of the instruments, especially leveraged derivatives, and/or seek independent advice before investing your own money and only use capital that you can afford to lose.